2/12/2024 0 Comments Hero realms rules discourseThe government’s unapologetic disdain for an independent, decentralized marketplace of ideas, and the social media platforms’ fawning obsequiousness in kowtowing to its “suggestions”-detailed exhaustively in the district court’s opinion and distilled by the Fifth Circuit-leave no doubt as to the side of the line on which their joint enterprise falls. That there is a dawn and a dusk, as the old proverb goes, does not mean there is no noon or no midnight. Its facts present a fusion of private and governmental action so plain as to blunt any protection that the state action and government speech doctrines might have provided. Where the line falls between impermissible government coercion and permissible cooperation, or between significant government encouragement and mere recommendation, is not directly pertinent to the disposition of this case. ![]() Biden, it would be easy but mistaken to be distracted by line-drawing and fact-categorizing difficulties. In assessing the Fifth Circuit’s historic decision in Missouri v. ![]() Participants in that workshop have written short notes to outline their thinking on this complex topic, which the Knight Institute is publishing in the weeks leading up to the convening. This blog post is part of that series. On October 20, 2023, the Knight Institute will host a closed convening to explore the question of jawboning: informal government efforts to persuade, cajole, or strong-arm private platforms to change their content-moderation policies. A research initiative studying governmental efforts to pressure social media platforms to change their content moderation policies and practices
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |